Rembold Klaus-Ferdinand Dr. med. vet. prakt. Tierarzt
Practice in Wurzacher Straße 57, 88339 Bad Waldsee, Germany
House calls across the Ravensburg, Biberach an der Riß, Wangen im Allgäu area
The Tierarztpraxis am Wurzacher Tor in Bad Waldsee offers comprehensive medical care for small and large animals. The team places great emphasis on thorough diagnostics and individual consultation. With services ranging from surgery to specialized examinations such as ultrasound and endoscopy, the practice is well-equipped to provide your animal with the best possible care.
Automatically generated summary based on public information.Treated animals
Small Animals & Pets
- cats
- dogs
Large & Farm Animals
- cattle
- pigs
Medical focus areas and specializations
- acupuncture
- anesthesia
- cardiology
- dentistry
- dermatology
- endoscopy
- general medicine
- homeopathy
- surgery
- ultrasound
- vaccinations
- x-ray
Opening hours
- Monday
- 11:00 AM–12:00 PM2:00 PM–6:00 PM
- Tuesday
- 11:00 AM–12:00 PM2:00 PM–6:00 PM
- Wednesday
- 11:00 AM–12:00 PM2:00 PM–6:00 PM
- Thursday
- 11:00 AM–12:00 PM2:00 PM–6:00 PM
- Friday
- 11:00 AM–12:00 PM2:00 PM–6:00 PM
- Saturday
- Closed
- Sunday
- Closed
Spoken languages
- 🇩🇪 German
Payment methods
Contact
- Website
- Email
- Phone
- Fax
Practice location and mobile service area
Rembold Klaus-Ferdinand Dr. med. vet. prakt. Tierarzt
Practice location
Wurzacher Straße 57
88339 Bad Waldsee
Germany
House calls
Ravensburg, Biberach an der Riß, Wangen im Allgäu
Reviews
Mr. Rembold takes plenty of time for the animals and treats them with great competence and affection. At his practice, you can also have your dog groomed by his veterinary assistant. You'll also be kept up-to-date on vaccinations. The entire team is very friendly, and you feel well cared for.
I am extremely disappointed with my experience at this veterinary clinic. My 16-year-old cat was examined there, and I was told he had a tooth infection and that his ears needed cleaning. They said this could only be treated with surgery and that he might not survive the operation. Without a blood test or any other examination, the vet scheduled the surgery for the very next day. I was worried and sought a second opinion. The second vet confirmed that surgery at this age would be fatal and completely unnecessary. He also determined that my cat didn't have a tooth infection at all. They cleaned his ears without surgery. I feel deceived by the first clinic and therefore cannot recommend them. I would lose my cat – an absolute outrage! My cat wasn't even properly examined, so the diagnosis couldn't have been correct, which turned out to be true. It seems money was more important than the animal's well-being.
Super friendly and welcoming staff... The vet is fantastic; I've never been given such thorough information before. No questions were left unanswered. We felt very comfortable, well cared for, and understood. I'm so happy to have found this vet. Thank you so much for everything :-)
We were at the campervan site over Easter when our dog was bitten in the throat on Easter Sunday. We left a message on the answering machine and received an immediate call back. We were able to go straight to the practice and our dog received excellent care. We had a follow-up appointment on Monday and the wound looked good. A very nice and competent vet. It couldn't have been better. 🐶
Unfortunately, I must give this practice a very critical review, not only because of the medical outcome, but especially because of how I, as a pet owner, was treated. My cat was spayed at this practice in March 2025. Recently, however, she again showed clear signs of being in heat. A hormonal test was then performed by another veterinarian. The lab results (Antech Lab Germany) showed an anti-Müllerian hormone level of 2.54 pmol/l, while the reference range for spayed cats is below 0.57 pmol/l. This result clearly indicates residual functional ovarian tissue (ovarian residual syndrome). I subsequently contacted the original practice to calmly and objectively discuss the next steps and whether a necessary follow-up surgery could be scheduled. Instead of a professional clarification, I was laughed at, my statements were questioned, and the veterinarian who performed the second examination was disparagingly commented on ("What kind of doctor says something like that?"). There was no constructive discussion or attempt to find a solution. Furthermore, I was explicitly informed that the practice refused to perform the necessary follow-up surgery. When I asked whether, given this obvious surgical error, at least some reimbursement or support was possible, I received no objective or constructive answer whatsoever. The tone was rude, disrespectful, and in no way commensurate with the seriousness of the situation. Unfortunately, I cannot recommend this practice from either a medical or a human perspective.